|
|
|
crazy k
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2009, 10:56:47 AM » |
|
not bad. are you using a tripod?
you should try the first shot again but with a reduced contrast!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2009, 12:02:17 PM » |
|
LOL i added the contrast there... i LIKE it. :cuss: and yeah. always use a tripod at night, i like to use low ISO settings (any time) so a tripod is always close by me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
crazy k
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2009, 12:12:42 PM » |
|
LOL i added the contrast there... i LIKE it. :cuss: and yeah. always use a tripod at night, i like to use low ISO settings (any time) so a tripod is always close by me. LOL!!!! i tried! Get some more pics!!!! hell post the unaltered contrast version of the first one? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
88red4cyl
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2009, 02:59:08 PM » |
|
Nice looking Z man!! And I like the Chevy trailer hitch.. Although I think it may look better (more defined) if only the bowtie lit up, and the rest was blacked out around it... I would love to have a Z34 or Euro 3.4 to run around town in...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
-Will
88 Fiero
95 Lumina
99 Lumina LTZ -- SOLD!!!
06 Monte Carlo LT
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2009, 03:56:20 PM » |
|
it lights up kindof weird. the bowtie comes on with the tail lights (in orange) and the back lights up with the brakes, and if youre braking and signalling, or have hazzard lights on the red flashes.
-Thanks for checkin it out
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2009, 04:44:10 PM » |
|
 there, no editing really to the car, other than to brighten it up a little. then i did a couple layers of black and white background. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2009, 04:44:55 PM » |
|
oh, and if you dont like that one... you can cram it up your asses!! haha
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
94CutlassVert
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2009, 10:45:22 PM » |
|
very nice
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Convertible
207ci, 3.4L DOHC, LQ1, V6, 4T60E, 74k miles, daily driver sold |
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2009, 06:58:27 AM » |
|
thankyou thankyou. it was a bit of work to make it this way, theres like 2 or 3 layers of B&W for the background, with masking layers on all but one. but the car? almost nothing done to it. i lightened it up a little so you could see some of the details on the nose, but other than that it remains untouched.
so, 88red4cyl, im waiting for YOUR oppinion! haha
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
88red4cyl
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2009, 02:49:50 PM » |
|
Personally, I liked the first version of that pic you posted the best...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
-Will
88 Fiero
95 Lumina
99 Lumina LTZ -- SOLD!!!
06 Monte Carlo LT
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2009, 05:26:44 PM » |
|
i guess some people just cant be pleased  its all good though. i like the second one more, but i kept it on file in layers, so im going to change the focus area on the ground, plus do a little editing to the car itself. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
88red4cyl
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2009, 08:42:01 AM » |
|
i guess some people just cant be pleased its all good though. i like the second one more, but i kept it on file in layers, so im going to change the focus area on the ground, plus do a little editing to the car itself. I think you may be confusing my post with Kens??? I never mentioned anything about the quality of the photos... While on the subject though, there are two things I like about the first version of that picture better... The first being that I don't care for the reflections of light on the front fender in the second pic... The first picture seems to hide the 'flaws' better... Second, the rear end looks whited out or blurry or something in the second pic.. In the first one the rear end looks much more defined.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
-Will
88 Fiero
95 Lumina
99 Lumina LTZ -- SOLD!!!
06 Monte Carlo LT
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2009, 04:23:05 PM » |
|
i guess some people just cant be pleased its all good though. i like the second one more, but i kept it on file in layers, so im going to change the focus area on the ground, plus do a little editing to the car itself. I think you may be confusing my post with Kens??? I never mentioned anything about the quality of the photos... While on the subject though, there are two things I like about the first version of that picture better... The first being that I don't care for the reflections of light on the front fender in the second pic... The first picture seems to hide the 'flaws' better... Second, the rear end looks whited out or blurry or something in the second pic.. In the first one the rear end looks much more defined.. youre probably right... its that blueberry kush that throws me off a little. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
crazy k
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 16, 2009, 04:29:14 PM » |
|
there, no editing really to the car, other than to brighten it up a little. then i did a couple layers of black and white background. VERY NICE! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
Topic: Z34 Night Shots (Read 858 times)
