|
Jay
|
 |
« on: March 18, 2009, 09:23:52 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2009, 10:52:39 PM » |
|
sweet man, thats pretty cool. it should have silver tail lights and be a different colour with no decals. lol and me driving. hahaha hey his mirrors are different too. same wheels as me...
i would love to see some interior shots now... can you sneak up on him?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
94CutlassVert
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2009, 11:53:05 PM » |
|
nice!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Convertible
207ci, 3.4L DOHC, LQ1, V6, 4T60E, 74k miles, daily driver sold |
|
|
|
crazy k
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2009, 07:34:20 AM » |
|
CS mirrors?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
Dstanic
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2009, 07:58:23 AM » |
|
That car would look nice in silver with no stickers. Are those decals part of some sort of package or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Dave _ 2003 Impala LS_ berry metallic _ SERIES II 3800 |
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2009, 12:16:13 PM » |
|
That car would look nice in silver with no stickers. for sure or petty much anything other than white. plus it needs the clear cornering lights, and i like the silver tail lights too. the black outlined ones and silver outlined ones arent as cool as the ones i have IMO |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SofaKingWeToddDid
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2009, 12:19:29 PM » |
|
 i love those tail lights!! lol -theyre the main reason i bought the car, i hated the door handles on it when i first got it. and i didnt like the interior really... but the tail lights, well they were worth spending $2000 on. haha |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
xLeGeNDx
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2009, 01:46:54 PM » |
|
Kind of looks like a CS vert that was modded to look like a Regal, cool nonetheless
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1992 Pontiac Grand Prix SE - Lightly Modded Find something simple and complicate it.
|
|
|
|
Jay
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2009, 02:50:25 PM » |
|
It was modified by C&C. The same company that did the conversions to the CS. And if anyone tells you different, I.E.: GM built the convertible from the ground up. They are FULL OF IT. The CSs were sent to C&C as hardtops.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
crazy k
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2009, 08:31:30 PM » |
|
It was modified by C&C. The same company that did the conversions to the CS. And if anyone tells you different, I.E.: GM built the convertible from the ground up. They are FULL OF IT. The CSs were sent to C&C as hardtops. ???? i thought they were built in house? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
Jay
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2009, 08:35:18 PM » |
|
No, they were not. Like the Camaro, Sunbird, ect - which were shipped to American Sunroof Corp.. They were shipped to another plant has HARDTOPS not far from the Doraville plant. Cars & Concepts had a plant in Doraville as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
94CutlassVert
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2009, 01:56:14 AM » |
|
i though that was just the early years though
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Convertible
207ci, 3.4L DOHC, LQ1, V6, 4T60E, 74k miles, daily driver sold |
|
|
|
crazy k
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2009, 07:22:52 AM » |
|
i though that was just the early years though x2 I thought it was the 88's only. got anything to back up what you've stated? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
Jay
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2009, 09:30:22 AM » |
|
I'd be willing to bet, Jake, that the sheet under your seat says C&C somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
crazy k
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2009, 10:22:45 PM » |
|
I'd be willing to bet, Jake, that the sheet under your seat says C&C somewhere. I'd like to see that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
cause I want you too.
|
|
|
|
Topic: Regal 'vert (Read 1242 times)
